An Adam without Eve
Have you ever wondered about the saying "A man's right hand is his lady," or "A man is incomplete without a women," or "A man's best quality comes from his companion?" I can't say that I have completely thought about these saying either, but after closely analyzing Frankenstein, I can say, that either of those sayings are quite universal and literal. How so? The story of Adam and Eve. Perhaps before I get into the symbolic relationship of Adam and Eve and Frankenstein, I should explain my brainstorming. First, let me tell you first about the prevalent, thematic theme of the Overreacher that is so highly emphasized through the novel. Victor Frankenstein is known to be the creator of Frankenstein, the one that brought life to the dead. In essence, Victor serves to the be the Sire of the text. In his lust and pursuit for knowledge comes the title of a higher human being. His affection for intelligence, a new discovery, for life, has made him a "creator," perhaps somewhat, God like. But is this true? Does Victor fit the true definition of an overreacher just for his creation of a male monster? In my thoughts...no. The true definition of an overreacher is one that creates for the happniess of other, for society- their acts are purely selfless. Although, Victor is quite the contrary; though it may seem that he is made this creation in order to give society a glimpse of where knowledge can take you, this is not the case. The novel reveals that Victor created this monster simply for pride- he wanted to be named a creator, an overreacher..but in reality, he does not deserve such a title. This is purely because he did not complete his task of an overreacher; the tasks being: to create, to comfort, to aid. He created...but did he comfort, did he aid the life of the monster? No. In fact, the true overreacher, known to be God, created a creature providing him with comfort and aid- firstly, he gave Adam comfort by presenting him Eve (a companion that he can befriend and love) and with that he gave them nature, the world, in order for them to live. Similar, if Victor gave the monster an "Eve," which he desired to have, he could have been named a true creator, an overreacher. Due to such a fact, Victor can be known as an unjust creator. Take a look at page 117, as the monster says: "...But it was all a dream; no Eve soothed my sorrows, nor shared my thoughts; I was alone. i remembered Adam's supplication to his Creator. But where was mine? he had abandoned me: and, in the bitterness of my heart, I cursed him." This excerpt proves that Victor could only be named a creator, if he had provided the monster with his eve, someone to console and comfort him through his time, but because of a failure to do so, his efforts are only seen as greed.
Have you ever wondered about the saying "A man's right hand is his lady," or "A man is incomplete without a women," or "A man's best quality comes from his companion?" I can't say that I have completely thought about these saying either, but after closely analyzing Frankenstein, I can say, that either of those sayings are quite universal and literal. How so? The story of Adam and Eve. Perhaps before I get into the symbolic relationship of Adam and Eve and Frankenstein, I should explain my brainstorming. First, let me tell you first about the prevalent, thematic theme of the Overreacher that is so highly emphasized through the novel. Victor Frankenstein is known to be the creator of Frankenstein, the one that brought life to the dead. In essence, Victor serves to the be the Sire of the text. In his lust and pursuit for knowledge comes the title of a higher human being. His affection for intelligence, a new discovery, for life, has made him a "creator," perhaps somewhat, God like. But is this true? Does Victor fit the true definition of an overreacher just for his creation of a male monster? In my thoughts...no. The true definition of an overreacher is one that creates for the happniess of other, for society- their acts are purely selfless. Although, Victor is quite the contrary; though it may seem that he is made this creation in order to give society a glimpse of where knowledge can take you, this is not the case. The novel reveals that Victor created this monster simply for pride- he wanted to be named a creator, an overreacher..but in reality, he does not deserve such a title. This is purely because he did not complete his task of an overreacher; the tasks being: to create, to comfort, to aid. He created...but did he comfort, did he aid the life of the monster? No. In fact, the true overreacher, known to be God, created a creature providing him with comfort and aid- firstly, he gave Adam comfort by presenting him Eve (a companion that he can befriend and love) and with that he gave them nature, the world, in order for them to live. Similar, if Victor gave the monster an "Eve," which he desired to have, he could have been named a true creator, an overreacher. Due to such a fact, Victor can be known as an unjust creator. Take a look at page 117, as the monster says: "...But it was all a dream; no Eve soothed my sorrows, nor shared my thoughts; I was alone. i remembered Adam's supplication to his Creator. But where was mine? he had abandoned me: and, in the bitterness of my heart, I cursed him." This excerpt proves that Victor could only be named a creator, if he had provided the monster with his eve, someone to console and comfort him through his time, but because of a failure to do so, his efforts are only seen as greed.
Interesting ideas here. It's weird to think that if Victor had created the female, in essence he would be sinning again--the same sin twice, but the second time with the knowledge of exactly WHAT he was doing. So, should he have created Eve? Eve also caused the destruction of the garden, so it her presence good or bad? So much to think about!
ReplyDelete